fbpx

BrandPost: How This and Remote Workers May Both Earn With VDI and HCI

 

The coronavirus outbreak is forcing a simple shift in the true way we work. That said, the proceed to remote work is a long-time coming. In accordance with business leaders, that is only the start of a long-term tendency to house working and reduced workplace occupancy. That’s no real surprise, as it could conserve them $11,each year 000 per remote worker. 1

A study conducted before the pandemic, in 2019, told us that 80% of the united states labor force wished to work from house at least a few of the period even in the past. 2 The pandemic has basically accelerated these trends: 82% of company leaders today say they intend to allow even more telecommuting-even following the pandemic. 3

      Remote Accessibility, Data Security, and Doing Even more with Less          

This surge towards remote working is driving IT teams to re-examine their timelines and plans for data center modernization. There exists a laser concentrate on supporting WFH employees and ramping up cybersecurity. Alongside collaboration and security, Forrester Analysis says that remote accessibility is among the three key systems required to maintain at-home employees successful and involved. 4

While 90% of IT professionals think remote employees aren’t secure, 92% also think that the advantages of remote function outweigh the risks. 5  And, so they’re searching for the best technology to solve the issues that large-scale telecommuting may pose:

    • Low efficiency  in virtualized apps

 

    • Security dangers of workers using home systems

 

    • IT management problems when helping off-site workers

 

 

Along with addressing these challenges, It really is charged with reducing expenses still.

      Desktop computer Virtualization on HCI          

Digital desktop infrastructure (VDI) can offer employees with secure usage of desktops, applications, and information from and on just about any device anywhere. But traditional VDI will be fraught with problems. Siloed infrastructure is hard to level and requires specialized knowledge.

This is why VDI on hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) is in the spotlight. HCI consolidates storage space, networking, and compute into one easy-to-manage system. It can benefit lower funds and operational expenses whilst boosting company resilience and agility.

FOR THIS, implementing VDI on HCI presents:

    • Quick preliminary deployment

 

    • Simple VM provisioning

 

    • Simple administration

 

 

For remote control workforces, VDI on HCI enables:

    • Quick access from just about any device

 

    • Sound conversation

and collaboration

    • Up-to-date programs

 

 

Leading VDI solutions consist of VMware Horizon, Citrix VDI, and Microsoft Virtual Desktop computer. The very best HCI offerings consist of VMware vSAN, Nutanix HCI, and Microsoft Azure Stack HCI.

      Why AMD EPYC™ Processors for VDI on HCI certainly are a game changer          

Maximize the advantages of VDI upon HCI with 2nd Gen AMD EPYC™, the best high-functionality x86 server processor chip 6 . Once you deploy digital desktops on HCI options driven by AMD EPYC™ it is possible to:

    • Accelerate virtualized apps:  Increase HCI overall performance with world-record efficiency in virtualisation. 7 A double CPU server powered by AMD EPYC™ 7F72 processors is 25% quicker in VMmark® 3.1 vSAN™ when compared to a server with two Intel® Xeon® 8268 processors. 8

 

    • Help protect data with advanced security features:  AMD EPYC™ may be the only x86 server processor with Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV). This breakthrough technology encrypts and isolates data used on a VM. Part of  AMD Infinity Guard , SEV helps keeps data safe with zero effect on performance virtually. 9

 

    • Impact data center costs:  In a 2P configuration, the AMD EPYC™ 7742 delivers 2.3x the VMmark® 3.1.1 vSAN™ performance and tile (VM) workload capacity when compared to a 4-host, 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8268, that may assist in saving money on data center space, power, and software licensing. 10 Actually, AMD EPYC™ processors might help reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) per VM by around 45% utilizing a single-socket EPYC 7702P processor-powered server in comparison to a dual-socket Intel Xeon Gold 6242 CPU-based server. 11

 

 

If you’d prefer to discover more about AMD EPYC processors and how they are able to boost VDI performance and keep your charges down, visit https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-for-hyperconverged-infrastructure

FOOTNOTES:

 

    1. Global Workplace Analytics, “Latest Work-At-Home/Telecommuting/Mobile Work/Remote Work Statistics,” …

       

 

    1. Global Workplace Analytics and OWL Labs, “State of Remote Work,” 2019

       

 

    1. Gartner, “Go back to the Workplace: Benchmarking Against Your Peers,” Webinar Poll, 2020

       

 

    1. Forrester Research, “Essential Technology for Remote and Quarantined Employees THROUGHOUT A Pandemic,” 2…

       

 

    1. OpenVPN, “Remote Work May be the Future – But CAN BE YOUR Organization Ready for this?,” 2020

       

 

    1. 16-n, 2P 2nd Gen EPYC™ 7702 powered server scores a worldwide world record consequence of 7100 SPECrate®2017_int_base   http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2020q1/cpu2017-20191223-20452.pdf . Another highest published score is 3920 SPECrate®2017_int_base  on a 16-n, 2-socket Xeon® 8180 powered server  http://spec.org/cpu2017/results/res2018q1/cpu2017-20171222-01950.pdf by 02/12/20. SPEC® and SPECrate® are trademarks of the typical Performance Evaluation Corporation. Find out more at  www.spec.org . ROM-517

       

 

    1. For a whole set of world records see  http://amd.com/worldrecords. ROM-169

       

 

    1. 4-node, 2x EPYC 7F72 processor powered cluster (192 total cores) with a score of 13.27@ 14 tiles on the VMmark® 3.1.1 benchmark using vSAN™ ( https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2020-04-14-DellEMC-PowerEdg… ) delivers 24.8% more performance with a 16.7% higher tile/VM workload capacity compared to the VMmark® 3.1 vSAN performance of a 4-node, 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 processor powered cluster (192 total cores) with a score of 10.63@12 tiles ( https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2020-06-30-Supermicro-SYS-2… ) by 06/08/20. ROM-732

       

 

    1. AMD Infinity Guard security features on EPYC™ processors should be enabled by server OEMs and/or Cloud PROVIDERS to operate. Consult with your provider or OEM to verify support of the features. Find out about Infinity Guard at  https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/infinity-guard . GD-177

       

 

    1. 4-node, 2x EPYC™ 7742 processor powered cluster with a score of 24.08@ 28 tiles on the VMmark® 3.1.1 benchmark using vSAN ( https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2020-04-28-DellEMC-PowerEdg… ) delivers 2.27x the performance and 2.33x the tile/VM workload capacity compared to the VMmark® 3.1.1 vSAN performance of a 4-node, 2x Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 processor powered cluster with a score of 10.63@12 tiles ( https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/vmmark/2020-06-30-Supermicro-SYS-2… ) by 06/08/20. ROM-737

       

 

    1. Comparison results calculated by AMD predicated on a hypothetical scenario hosting 3,200 virtual machines on 2-socket Intel Xeon 6242 16 cores ea. (32 total cores) based systems in comparison to 1-socket AMD EPYC™ 7702P 64 total core system, each VM (virtual machine) allocated one core, (1) 1 TB hard disk drive @ $387, and 8GB of DRAM with a price of $16.41 per GB using 16GB DDR4 DRAM. All calculations derive from AMD’s best estimates of what actual costs along with other values will undoubtedly be for both AMD and Intel based platforms. Each AMD 7702P system supports 64 VMs and each Intel 6242 system supports 32 VMs, for a complete of 50 AMD powered servers and 100 Intel based servers. These estimates usually do not include and VM server management costs. System Configurations: Intel Xeon based servers include (2) Intel® Xeon® Gold 6242 @ $2,529 ea, with 256 GB of memory, a dual socket 2U rack mount server, each with power supplies, and NIC @ $2,500, for a complete per server price of $12,146.56 ea. and a complete hardware acquisition price of $1,214,656. AMD EPYC™ servers add a single socket 2U rack mount chassis, with (1) AMD EPYC™ 7702P at $4,425, with 512 GB of memory, an individual socket 2U rack mount server, each with power supplies, and NIC @ $2,200, for a complete per server price of $15,414.52 ea. and a complete hardware acquisition price of $770,726. Power estimates: AMD 315 watts per server each hour, for a complete solution power of 1360.per month for 50 servers 8 kW. Intel 415 watts per server each hour, for a complete solution power of 3585.per month for 100 servers 6 kW. Three-year total power with a PUE of 2 and an electrical cost of $0.12 per kWh: AMD – $97,977.60 and Intel – $258,163.20. Data center three-year property cost estimates predicated on $20/mth/sq ft and 27 sq ft per rack are for: Intel is 5 rack cabinets at $97,200 and for AMD of $48,600 (2.5 rack cabinets). Server Administration cost is calculated having an estimate of $110,500 annually per server administrator (includes 30% burden) with a ratio of 1 server administrator per 30 servers leading to Intel cost of $1,105,000 (for 100 servers) and for AMD $552,500 (for 50 servers) for total 3 yr server administration costs.  Year TCO because of this is $ 2 total estimated 3,675,019 for the Intel-based Systems and $1,469,804 for the AMD EPYC powered systems.  Because of this, AMD EPYC based systems are estimated to provide up to 45% lower TCO (excluding software costs). Annual cost per VM: ( 1469804/3200 )/3=$279; ( 2675091/3200 )/3=$153.This scenario contains many estimates and assumptions and, while predicated on AMD internal research and best approximations, is highly recommended a good example for information purposes only, rather than used as a basis for decision making over actual testing. ROM-329

       

 

 

%d bloggers like this: